11 Comments
User's avatar
catothewiser's avatar

Hate to hear that. May have only known about them through you because I don't travel in those circles, but when some site dies, I know the sense of loss.

Christopher Renner's avatar

Maybe the solution is to do substantially all of the censoring on the front end (i.e., filter for nonhuman traits at account creation/modification rather than on a post-by-post basis)? My fun way to do this would be to require the registrant to post something racist, but CAPTCHAs and the like would also probably work.

Christopher Brunet's avatar

requiring users to register for an account would have been the only way to mitigate spam. Then the spammers would at least have to spend time registering email addresses to keep spamming

Christopher Renner's avatar

Oh I didn't realize that registration wasn't even required. That checks.

Elijah's avatar

somebody could literally vibecode an alternative within a day. the only issue is that they would have to maintain it

Oli's avatar

Would Chris do this?

Christopher Brunet's avatar

seems like a lot of work

Elijah's avatar

check your DMs

Thomas Thane's avatar

It's almost like an LLM can't generate network effects

Elijah's avatar

what is needed is an organization, non profit, maybe cooperative, which consults the field, meets with academics and hears their needs. then spends time building a platform that is conducive to those needs.